![]() |
| illustrated imaged from pinterest,com |
There is plenty of discussion and disagreement on whether
it's better to teach children using whole language programs or using methods
which incorporate phonics and phonemic awareness instructions. I think the
debate on this is settled when the National Reading Panel stated from their
findings of reviewing over 1,900 studies that phonics and phonemic awareness
produces superior reading results than whole language programs.
There is also some debate on whether to teach your child only
letter names, or only the sounds which the letters represent. However, studies
have also settled this debate by finding that teaching a child alphabet names
and sounds together produces the best results. In fact, studies have found that
there is little value in teaching preschoolers letter forms or letter sounds
separately. This was indicated by an Australian study involving 76 preschool
children.
The children received 6 weeks of training in either letter awareness,
phonemic awareness, or control tasks, and then received another 6 weeks of
training in either letter-sound correspondence or control tasks. The study
found that training in either phoneme or letter awareness assisted with
learning of letter-sound correspondences, and that the phonemically trained
children group had an advantage on recognition tasks. The study found that
there is little value in training in letter form or letter sounds separately. [1]
As you can see, there is basically no point in only teaching
either the names of the alphabet letters, or the sounds the letters make. A
child must learn the name and the sound of the alphabet letter. When teaching
your child the alphabet, instead of simply teaching them the name of the
alphabet such as "this is the letter A", teach them like so:
"This is the letter A, and the letter A makes the /A/
sound." (note: the /A/ denote the sound "A" makes, and not its
name). Similarly, you can teach your child the other alphabet letters in this
way including both name and sound of the letter. This is the way I teach my
children the alphabet letters. Other studies have also determined that teaching
the letter names and sounds together helped children learn.
58 preschool children were randomly assigned to receive
instructions in letter names and sounds, letter sound only, or numbers (control
group). The results of this study are consistent with past research results in
that it found children receiving letter name and sound instruction were most
likely to learn the sounds of letters whose names included cues to their
sounds. [2]
To be able to effectively teach your children the sounds of
letters, you must first master the proper pronunciation of the letters
yourself. It is critical for you as a parent to be able to first say the sounds
of the letters correctly before teaching your children, and this is much
tougher than it may seem.
Notes:
1. J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Sep;104(1):68-88. Epub 2009
Mar 5.
The genesis of reading ability: what helps children learn letter-sound correspondences?
Castles A, Coltheart M, Wilson K, Valpied J, Wedgwood J.
Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.
The genesis of reading ability: what helps children learn letter-sound correspondences?
Castles A, Coltheart M, Wilson K, Valpied J, Wedgwood J.
Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia.
2. J Exp Child Psychol. 2010 Apr;105(4):324-44. Epub 2010
Jan 25.
Learning letter names and sounds: effects of instruction, letter type, and phonological processing skill.
Piasta SB, Wagner RK.
Preschool Language and Literacy Lab, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.
Learning letter names and sounds: effects of instruction, letter type, and phonological processing skill.
Piasta SB, Wagner RK.
Preschool Language and Literacy Lab, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA.


Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar